맥심가렌 [1147708] · MS 2022 · 쪽지

2022-09-26 00:01:05
조회수 6,243

영어 자작 문항 (난이도 下)

게시글 주소: https://faitcalc.orbi.kr/00058528518

33. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 내용으로 가장 적절한 것은? [3점]


The one-way-ness of proof of what you've undergone - as the aspect of credibility - is emerged while you experience the absurd investigation of agencies you meet. Imagine you've ridden a taxi without any black boxes or even a camera, and you suddenly got into a car accident intended by a habitual aggressive driver. You will feel irrational while the investigation is under process. The rude driver seems to merely apologize to the investigation agency and insurance company rather than prove his innocence and consult with you and your companions. Smelling fishy, you take your signature on the agreement paper. Unfortunately, the stratagem of the driver is well recognized, and we say you failed to overcome the inherent passiveness of the defendant. As I said before, the engraved shrink of self-esteem is natural, especially when you are in a real-life application like a car accident. However, I do not guarantee that parties tolerate your passive voice unless you prove the certain intent of the aggressive driver without any flow. The circumstance of suing and persuading maybe is seemed as harsh, especially for an unprofessional member like you. Yet ________________________, do not fall in the gain-and-gain logic plaintiffs claim. Winning in the fluency bites you an overall triumph of the sue, and an active attitude of outfacing the erratum you watch is commonly demanded. If the atmosphere flows in the forward direction, then there is even a chance to bring up the inflexible 'crime' or 'fault' they made, and don't forget hardly 5 % of the total defendants reach the stage of counterattack.


① follow the pre-existing successful speech logic of lawyers who had spoken

② think about the numerous cases defendants had won in the past with the appeal based on the verified facts

③ make sure not to spoil the originality of the speaking datum your legal team wrote for you

④ expect the counter-effects that occur with their clumsy and negatively-listening word choices

⑤ do not give appeals to judges which are too biased in exerting your current emotional conditions

rare-수혀니 Ⅲ rare-수혀니 Ⅱ

0 XDK (+0)

  1. 유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.

  • 김석찐 · 843612 · 22/09/26 00:11 · MS 2018

    2번..? 개어렵네영

  • 맥심가렌 · 1147708 · 22/09/26 00:12 · MS 2022

    일단 정답이기 때문에 '어렵다'라는 말은 기만으로 판정되었습니다
    지문 퀄리티는 어느정도되는것같나요
  • 김석찐 · 843612 · 22/09/26 00:14 · MS 2018 (수정됨)

    전반적으로 괜찮은 것 같은데 너무 예시 분량이 많네요.. 일반화된 문장이 좀 더 있었으면 좋을 것 같아용

  • 맥심가렌 · 1147708 · 22/09/26 00:14 · MS 2022

    30분만에 쓴 글이라 너무 두서가없네요.. 수능끝나면 각잡고 여러개 만들어봐야죠
  • 김석찐 · 843612 · 22/09/26 00:20 · MS 2018 (수정됨)

    아 직접 쓰신거에요? 와 미친.. 논문에서 퍼오신 건줄 알았는데 개잘쓰신듯
  • SNU_PSIR · 1158868 · 22/09/26 00:12 · MS 2022

    수능에 나오면 나름 킬러일것같은데..ㄷㄷ

  • 맥심가렌 · 1147708 · 22/09/26 00:14 · MS 2022

    수능에 나오기에는 조금 퀄리티가 떨어지는 지문일듯요.. 이게 제가 쓰면서도 '굳이 예시를 든 이유가 글 전체에서 묻어나는가?' 에 대한 의문부호가 조금 있었음
    이렇게 passive한 글을 가져다가 수능에 낼거같지는 않긴해요 ㅋㅋ
  • 국어학가망있나 · 1159823 · 22/09/26 00:16 · MS 2022

    one-way-ness나 gain-and-gain처럼 하이픈으로 연결된 거 뭔 뜻이죠?

  • 맥심가렌 · 1147708 · 22/09/26 00:18 · MS 2022

    일반적으로 하이픈으로 연결된 것은 작성자가 임의로 창조한 신조어일 가능성이 40%, 구어체에서 'side-by-side', 'win-win'처럼 일반적으로 쓰이는 표현일 가능성이 60%이고, 제 글에서는 전자입니다. one-way-ness는 '일방향성', gain-and-gain은 '점입가경의' 정도로 해석하시면 될 것 같아요
  • 국어학가망있나 · 1159823 · 22/09/26 00:19 · MS 2022

    아 복잡하다

  • 맥심가렌 · 1147708 · 22/09/26 00:21 · MS 2022

    수능영어는 절대로 이런 더러운 문장을 쓰지 않습니다. 제가 작문 경력이 수능 지문의 원천이 되는 글을 쓰신 수십년 된 달필마냥 긴 것도 아니고, 문제 출제는 고작 석달차 입니다. 지문을 맘대로 퍼오지 못하는 자연인 특성상 지문을 혼자 창작해야 하는 고통..